MINUTES of a regular meeting
of the MUNICIPAL COUNCIL of The Corporation of the District of Oak Bay, held in
the Council Chambers, Oak Bay Municipal Hall,
|
PRESENT: |
Councillor
H. Braithwaite Councillor
S. F. B. Carson Councillor
A. R. Cassidy Councillor
P. Copley Councillor
J. D. Herbert Councillor
N. B. Jensen |
|
STAFF: |
Municipal Administrator, W. E. Cochrane Municipal Clerk, L. Hilton Confidential Secretary, K. Green Director of Building and Planning, N. Beattie Municipal Treasurer, P. A. Walker Director of Engineering Services, D. |
MINUTES OF MEETINGS:
Council –
February 25, 2008
MOVED by Councillor Herbert
Seconded by Councillor Copley,
That the minutes of the Council meeting held on Monday, February 25, 2008, be adopted.
CARRIED
Committee of the Whole – March 3, 2008
MOVED by Councillor Herbert
Seconded by Councillor Copley,
That the minutes of the Committee of the Whole meeting held on Monday, March 3,
2008, and the recommendations contained therein, be adopted.
CARRIED
PRESENTATIONS:
Introduction of New Police
Department Members
(Deputy Chief Constable Thom,
Oak Bay Police Department, in attendance for this item.)
The Deputy Chief Constable introduced Cst. Lauren
Grekul and Cst. Jennifer Gibbs as new members to the Oak Bay Police Department
effective January 28, 2008. Deputy Chief
Thom provided a brief description of Cst. Grekul and Cst. Gibbs’ careers and
welcomed them both to
On behalf of Council and the community,
COMMUNICATIONS:
|
1. |
2008-66 |
CAPITAL REGIONAL DISTRICT, February 18, 2008 Re Capital Regional District Climate Action and Adaptation Service
Establishment Bylaw No. 3510 |
Dwayne Kalynchuk,
General Manager, Environmental Services, Capital Regional District, was in attendance
to provide a brief overview of the proposed Climate Action and Adaptation
Service Establishment Bylaw and to answer any questions from Council.
Mr. Kalynchuk explained
that the bylaw establishes a climate action service for the Capital Regional
District to undertake regional monitoring and reporting on air quality and
green house gas emissions, and to work with the regional members on climate
action, adaptation, assisting with grant applications, and providing public
education and information.
Following further
discussion regarding the Capital Regional District’s climate action and
adaptation service bylaw, and various questions from Council being answered by
Mr. Kalynchuk, it was the consensus of Council to support the bylaw.
MOVED by Councillor Jensen
Seconded by
Councillor Copley, That consent be given to the adoption of the Capital
Regional District Bylaw No. 3510, Capital Regional District Climate Action and
Adaptation Service Establishment Bylaw, 2008, in accordance with Section 801.4 of the Local Government Act.
CARRIED
|
2. |
2008-67 2006-360 2008-67-1 - - 2007-263 2007-263-3 2007-263-4 2007-237 2007-237-1 2007-237-2 2007-237-3 2007-237-4 2007-237-5 2007-237-6 2007-237-7 2007-237-8 |
MUNICIPAL CLERK,
March 5, 2008 DIRECTOR OF
BUILDING AND PLANNING, October 24, 2006 ROYAL EXCERPT FROM
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES – October 9, 2007 PHILIP WHITE,
September 14, 2007 JACK HARRIS,
October 4, 2007 BARRY PHILLIPS,
October 5, 2007 PHILIP WHITE,
August 2, 2007 NEVILLE GIBSON,
September 4, 2007 GEORGE MACMINN,
September 4, 2007 JOHN CHUDYK,
September 6, 2007 PAUL THOMAS,
September 9, 2007 PETER READER,
September 6, 2007 TOM CROFT,
September 10, 2007 ATHOLL AND R.
SUTHERLAND BROWN, September 2, 2007 SAVE THE
SHORELINE OF CADBORO BAY SOCIETY, August 21, 2007 Re Proposal from Philip White for Amendment to
Official Community Plan Regarding |
Councillor Herbert declared a conflict
inasmuch as he is a member of the Saanich Peninsula Yacht Club with reciprocal
privileges with the Royal Victoria Yacht Club, indicating that he would be
unable to participate in discussion or vote on the matter. Councillor Herbert left the meeting at 7:49
p.m.
The Municipal Administrator provided a
brief summary noting that at its September 10, 2007 meeting, Council agreed to
defer the proposal from Philip White to amend the Official Community Plan (OCP)
to restrict expansion of moorage facilities at the Royal Victoria Yacht Club to
a future meeting to allow the Royal Victoria Yacht Club to be heard at the same
time as Mr. White with respect to its application to expand the moorage
facilities at the Club. Since that time,
the Royal Victoria Yacht Club has withdrawn its expansion proposal, however,
Mr. White expressed his wish to move forward with his proposal at this
time. Mr. Cochrane noted that as the
proposal affects the Royal Victoria Yacht Club land, the Club has been notified
that this item is on the agenda.
Philip White, 3525 Beach Drive, provided an overview of his request for an
amendment to the Official Community Plan (OCP) saying the OCP should be a
clear, unambiguous statement of policy and state how that policy should be
implemented. Mr. White felt that the
section in the OCP that deals with permanent moorage and restricting any
moorage expansion in the Oak Bay Marina should apply to the Royal Victoria
Yacht Club as well, and that it was a drafting error that failed to ensure that
such is the case.
Additionally, Mr. White questioned the
necessity of having the restrictions directed at the Oak Bay Marina spelled out
when, in fact, the provincially owned land is subleased to the Oak Bay Marina
from the District of Oak Bay, which has, through the lease, control of the
land.
Mr. White distributed a ‘fact sheet’ that
pointed out and compared various pieces of information pertaining to foreshore
lease areas in Oak Bay, that included foreshore lease rents, number and average
size of moorage berths, and assessed property values. It was Mr. White’s opinion that neighbouring
property values would decline should a future moorage expansion be permitted at
the Yacht Club, as illustrated in his handout.
He further stated that this would result in reduced tax revenues for the
District of Oak Bay as well.
Jack Angus, Royal Victoria Yacht Club, responded to comments and noted that the
Oak Bay Marina and the Royal Victoria Yacht Club should not be lumped into the
same category as one is commercial the other is a recreational facility. He also pointed out that should a future
expansion application be submitted by the Royal Victoria Yacht Club an
amendment would be needed for the OCP, and public consultation would be
undertaken at that time.
Harry Swain, Royal Victoria Yacht Club, noted that Mr. White’s proposal arose in
response to the Yacht Club application for moorage expansion. As the Club withdrew its application, he
said, Mr. White’s proposal should not be explored at this time, and, instead, a
new application from the Yacht Club with respect to its expansion should
trigger an OCP amendment.
It was the consensus of Council to only
hear from Mr. White and the Yacht Club representatives at this time, noting
that if the proposal should proceed to Committee of the Whole, public
consultation would be undertaken in accordance with the provincial legislation.
Responding to questions from Council, Mr.
Cochrane noted that the current wording in the OCP is substantially the same as
the wording of the 1981 OCP with respect to restricting moorage expansion at
the Oak Bay Marina. He advised that when
the 1981 OCP was being prepared, Council made a conscious decision to add the
words “at the Oak Bay Marina”. Therefore,
he said, it would not be correct to categorize the absence of wording to
restrict moorage at the Yacht Club as a mistake, as clearly there was
consideration given to the existing wording.
Following discussion, it was the consensus
of Council that it was satisfied with the wording in the Official Community
Plan, and that the request to amend the OCP should not be proceeded with.
MOVED by Councillor Jensen
Seconded by Councillor Braithwaite,
That correspondence item no. 2008-68 be received.
It was reiterated
that any future application from the Yacht Club for moorage expansion would
require an OCP amendment, and it was felt that it was not in the best interests
of the community to proceed with Mr. White’s proposal for a change to the
Official Community Plan.
The question was then called.
CARRIED
Councillor Herbert returned to the meeting at 8:37
p.m.
|
3. |
2008-68 |
ROB AND LINDA VANDERBYL / VERN AND MARGARET MCKEEN, February 20, 2008 Re Request to Undertake Work on
Trees Protected by Restrictive Covenant (619 & 623 |
MOVED by Councillor Jensen
Seconded by Councillor Copley,
That pursuant to the restrictive covenant registered against the Jones Estate
property, approval be given to carry out the requested tree work at 619 and
CARRIED
|
4. |
2008-69 |
BIKE TO WORK Re Grant Request/Occupancy of Public Property Request |
(Stephanie
Johnson, Executive Director, Bike to Work Victoria, in attendance for this
item.)
Stephanie Johnson addressed Council
saying that Bike to Work Week was very successful in 2007 with approximately
6,100 people participating in the event.
Ms. Johnson said the
organizers would like to again request permission to set up a ‘celebration
station’ on the Oak Bay Municipal Hall front lawn to support cyclists using the
Ms. Johnson responded to
questions from Council regarding the event.
MOVED by Councillor Jensen
Seconded by
Councillor Braithwaite, That a grant of $750 be provided to Bike to Work
Victoria, and further that permission be given to Bike to Work Victoria to host
a celebration station on the front lawn of the Oak Bay Municipal Hall, subject
to the event organizers indemnifying the Municipality against any liability
arising from the staging of the event and providing evidence of adequate
insurance to cover this indemnification, and assuming all responsibility for
any and all extraordinary costs incurred by the Municipality in connection with
the event.
CARRIED
|
5. |
2008-70 |
MARITIME Re Grant Request |
(Greg
Evans, Executive Director, Maritime Museum of British Columbia Society, in
attendance for this item.)
Greg Evans, provided a brief
overview of the
Responding to
MOVED by Councillor Jensen
Seconded by Councillor Copley,
That a 2008 operating grant in the amount of $2,060 be approved for the
Maritime Museum of British Columbia Society, with the remainder of the request
being referred to Estimates Committee.
CARRIED
|
6. |
2008-71 |
BC SPCA WILD
ANIMAL REHABILITATION CENTRE, February 28, 2008 Re Grant Request |
MOVED by Councillor Carson
Seconded by Councillor Braithwaite,
That correspondence item no. 2008-71 be received.
CARRIED
|
7. |
2008-72 |
MUNICIPAL TREASURER, March 6, 2008 Re Social Service Agency Operating Grant Requests |
(Val
Green, Volunteer Victoria and Christina Peacock, Community Council, in
attendance for this item.)
Val Green and Christina Peacock, on behalf of their organizations, expressed
gratitude to
Volunteer
MOVED by Councillor Herbert
Seconded by Councillor Braithwaite, That the
request for a 2008 operating grant in the amount of $2,773 for Volunteer
Victoria be referred to Estimates Committee.
CARRIED
Community
Council
MOVED by Councillor Herbert
Seconded by Councillor Braithwaite, That the
request for a 2008 operating grant in the amount of $4,022 for Community
Council be referred to Estimates Committee.
CARRIED
MOVED by Councillor Braithwaite
Seconded by Councillor Herbert, That the
following grant requests be referred to Estimates Committee:
NEED Crisis and Information Line $4,873
CARRIED
|
8. |
2008-73 2008-73-1 |
ROBERT AND FRANCES HEISLER, March 6, 2008 MICHAEL CULLIN, [undated] Re Development Variance Permit – |
MOVED by Councillor Jensen
Seconded by
Councillor Braithwaite, That correspondence items no. 2008-73 and 2008-73-1 be
received.
CARRIED
NEW BUSINESS/REPORTS FROM OTHER COMMITTEES:
Earth Hour 2008
Community Initiatives Committee
Councillor Herbert noted that the
Garagellenium
TABLED:
Development Variance Permit – 2032 Esplanade
MOVED by Councillor Jensen
Seconded by Councillor Copley,
That the following motion be lifted from the table:
That the Director of Building and Planning be
authorized to issue a Development Variance Permit with respect to 2032
Esplanade (Lot 5, Section 61, Victoria District, Plan 3833), varying the
following provisions of Bylaw No. 3531, being the Zoning Bylaw, 1986, as amended, with respect to the occupiable
height and front yard setback:
|
Bylaw Section |
Required |
Requested |
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5.4.(3)(b) & Schedule “B” Maximum
Occupiable Height |
4.42 m |
4.57 m |
0.15 m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5.4.(2)(a) Front |
7.62 m |
5.85 m |
1.77 m |
to accommodate the addition/renovations, as more
particularly shown on the plans attached to Committee of the Whole agenda item
#2008-47, being a memorandum from the Director of Building and Planning dated
February 12, 2008.
CARRIED
The question on the main motion was then called.
CARRIED
Development Variance Permit –
MOVED by Councillor Jensen
Seconded by Councillor Herbert,
That the following motion be lifted from the table:
That the Director of Building and Planning be
authorized to issue a Development Variance Permit with respect to 963 Beach
Drive (Lot A, Section 73, Victoria District, Plan 15273), varying the following
provisions of Bylaw No. 3531, being the Zoning
Bylaw, 1986, as amended, with respect to the building height:
|
Bylaw Section |
Permitted |
Requested |
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1.4.(3)(a) & Schedule “B” |
7.32 m |
8.14 m |
0.82 m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1.4.(3)(b) & Schedule “B” Maximum Occupiable Height |
4.57 m |
5.39 m |
0.82 m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1.4.(3)(c) & Schedule “B” Maximum Roof Height |
9.14 m |
10.73 m |
1.59 m |
to accommodate the construction of a new house, as
more particularly shown on the plans attached to Committee of the Whole agenda
item #2008-48, being a memorandum from the Director of Building and Planning
dated February 12, 2008.
CARRIED
Responding to a question from a member of Council, the
Director of Building and Planning advised that following a discussion between
the applicant, Richard Auchinleck and his neighbour, Robert Heisler (975 Beach
Drive), the owner is wishes make changes to the application to reduce the number
of variances to one from the original three requested.
Michael Cullin, Designer, drew attention to the proposed change which would
see the building being lowered further into the ground. Lowering the building, he noted, would also
require lowering the driveway to the attached garage, bringing it too close to
the underground sanitary sewer line.
Therefore, it is proposed that the sewer line be relocated.
Responding to questions, the Municipal Administrator
confirmed that new plans would need to be submitted to reflect the proposed
changes, and that a deposit to cover the cost of relocating the sewer line,
along with the execution of a servicing agreement would be required prior to
the issuance of a building permit, should that option be pursued.
Robert Heisler, 975 Beach Drive, was in attendance to express his remaining
concern that the height of the proposed new building at
Responding to a question from Mr. Cullin, staff
confirmed that if the applicant changed the existing plans to remove the
highest section of the roof, referred to as the pyramid, the applicant would
not need to obtain a development variance permit, as the plans would be
consistent with the regulations.
Following further discussion, and staff responding to
questions from Council, the application for a development variance permit was
withdrawn by the applicant.
MOVED by Councillor Herbert
Seconded by Councillor Copley,
That the resolution authorizing the issuance of a development variance permit
for
CARRIED
RESOLUTIONS:
Development Variance Permit –
MOVED by Councillor Jensen
Seconded by Councillor
Braithwaite, That the Director
of Building and Planning be authorized to issue a Development Variance Permit
with respect to 565 Oliver Street (Lot 15, Block D, Section 22, Victoria
District, Plan 1092) that will vary the following provisions of Bylaw No. 3540
(Parking Facilities Bylaw, 1986),
with respect to the number and type of required on-site parking spaces:
|
Parking Facilities Bylaw Section |
Required |
Requested |
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7 and Schedule A, A.1.(a) Minimum No. of
Parking Spaces |
2 spaces, Incl. 1 in
building |
1 space (none in Building) |
1 space (waive the “1
space in building” requirement) |
to accommodate the elimination of the pre-existing in
building parking space, as shown on the plans printed for the purposes of the
March 10, 2008 Council agenda and as described in Committee of the Whole agenda
item #2008-62, being a memorandum from the Director of Building and Planning
dated February 27, 2008.
MOVED by Councillor Jensen
Seconded by Councillor
Herbert, That the motion in
respect of the development variance permit for
CARRIED
Development Variance Permit –
MOVED by Councillor Jensen
Seconded by Councillor
Braithwaite, That the Director
of Building and Planning be authorized to issue a Development Variance Permit
with respect to 1852 Hampshire Road (Lot 11, Section 61, Victoria District,
Plan 1266), varying the following provisions of Bylaw No. 3531, being the Zoning Bylaw, 1986, as amended, with
respect to the siting of a structure:
|
Bylaw Section |
Required |
Requested |
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5.4. (2) (c) Minimum Interior
|
1.52 m |
0.0 m |
1.52 m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5.4. (7) Minimum Clear Space Between Buildings and Structures
|
3.0 m |
0.51 m |
2.49 m |
to accommodate the constructed rose arbour, as more
particularly shown on the plans attached to Committee of the Whole agenda item
#2008-63, being a memorandum from the Director of Building and Planning dated
February 28, 2008.