MINUTES of a regular meeting of the MUNICIPAL COUNCIL of The Corporation of the District of Oak Bay, held in the Council Chambers, Oak Bay Municipal Hall, 2167 Oak Bay Avenue, Oak Bay, B.C., on Monday, December 15, 2008 at 7:30 p.m.

 

PRESENT:

Mayor C. M. Causton, Chairman

Councillor H. Braithwaite

Councillor A. R. Cassidy

Councillor P. Copley

Councillor J. D. Herbert

Councillor N. B. Jensen

Councillor T. Ney

STAFF:

Municipal Administrator, W. E. Cochrane

Municipal Clerk, L. Hilton

Confidential Secretary, K. Green

Director of Building and Planning, R. Thomassen

Municipal Treasurer, P. A. Walker

Director of Engineering Services, D. Marshall

 

Mayor Causton called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.

 

ADOPTION OF MINUTES:

 

Council – November 24, 2008

 

MOVED by Councillor Herbert

Seconded by Councillor Jensen, That the minutes of the Council meeting held on Monday, November 24, 2008, be adopted.

CARRIED

 

Council (Inaugural) December 8, 2008

 

Referring to the confirmation of appointments, Mayor Causton noted that the appointment of Christopher Watts to the Greater Victoria Public Library Board should be rescinded due to the restructuring of the Board as of January 1, 2009, reflected in the new Library Operating Agreement.  He noted that Councillor Pam Copley will continue as the representative for Oak Bay.

 

MOVED by Councillor Herbert

Seconded by Councillor Copley, That the appointment of Christopher Watts to the Greater Victoria Public Library Board be rescinded, that the minutes of the December 8, 2008 Council meeting be amended to remove Christopher Watts from the confirmation of appointments resolution, and that the minutes, as amended be adopted. 

CARRIED

 

COMMUNICATIONS:

 

1.

- -

 

2009-2

2008-253

2008-253-1

 

EXCERPT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES, October 14, 2008

MAYOR CAUSTON, December 12, 2008

THOMAS ZABAN, September 2, 2008

PEARLMAN LINDHOLM BARRISTERS & SOLICITORS, September 24, 2008

Re Public Lane Between 2755 and 2765 Lansdowne Road

 

At its meeting of October 14, 2008, Council deferred correspondence item 2008-253 to a future meeting to allow discussions between the owners of 2755 and 2765 Lansdowne Road regarding the public land between their properties and the proposed use of it by the owner of 2755 Lansdowne, Mr. Zaban.  Mayor Causton offered to meet with the property owners on site to assist where possible in that regard.

 

Following the removal of the tree at 2755 Lansdowne Road, Mayor Causton advised that he met on site again with Mr. Zaban and the Selwoods to discuss potential options acceptable to both parties with respect to the lane. 

 

Mayor Causton drew attention to his memorandum outlining recommendations to deal with the situation of the lane, noting that both property owners agreed with the recommendations, which include paving a portion of the lane and planting hedge trees.

 

Responding to questions, the Municipal Administrator advised that the use of a boulevard encroachment agreement was not recommended as the onus for planting and maintaining the height of the trees would fall to Mr. Zaban under such an agreement, when it is the Selwoods that wish the trees to be planted and kept at a maximum height of ten feet.  Should Mr. Zaban not maintain the tree height as agreed, the work would fall to the Municipality in any event, so Oak Bay should take the responsibility for planting and maintaining them, while Mr. Zaban would pay for the all work to be carried out and the cost of the trees.

 

Should Council agree with the recommendations proposed, said Mr. Cochrane, staff would prepare an estimated cost for the work to be carried out by the Parks Department and Public Works Department, and payment would be required prior to the start of the project with any remaining funds being returned to Mr. Zaban.  The Cedar trees would, effectively, be a donation to the Municipality, he said.

 

MOVED by Councillor Jensen

Seconded by Councillor Braithwaite, That the recommendations as outlined in correspondence item no. 2009-2, be endorsed.

 

CARRIED

 

2.

2009-3

2009-3-1

COMMANDER (R) G. R. TELFER, CD (Retired), November 27, 2008

COMMANDER (R) G. R. TELFER, CD (Retired), December 1, 2008

Re Request to Change Street Name – Elgin Road to Burns Street

 

Mr. Telfer said he moved to “Poet’s Corner” six years ago and provided an overview of the history of the naming of Elgin Road.  He said it was formerly known as Burns Street until 1921 when the postal service changed the name to Elgin Road because of another Burns Avenue in the Victoria region.  Now with the postal code system alleviating any concerns about similar street names, Mr. Telfer felt that it would be appropriate to honour the Scottish poet, Robbie Burns, in the cluster of poet streets by changing Elgin Road back to Burns Street.

 

Discussion ensued with members of Council expressing concern about the impact on residents and property owners who would be affected by the proposed change, and noting that costs would be attributable to address changes.

 

The Mayor commented that there are several other streets that have had name changes, i.e. St. James to Transit Road, noting that additional requests to change back to original street names may also be received.

 

MOVED by Councillor Herbert

Seconded by Councillor Ney, That the request to change the street name from Elgin Road to Burns Street be referred to the Heritage Committee for recommendations on how to proceed.

 

CARRIED

 

3.

2009-4

2009-4-1

2009-4-2

2009-4-3

2009-4-4

2009-4-5

DON HUDSON, November 6, 2008

MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATOR, December 10, 2008

LOGAN STEWART, October 1, 2008

NICOLE ROBERTS, October 1, 2008

TOM DHEENSAW, October 1, 2008

LOGAN STEWART et al, November 30, 2008

Re Request to Install Amateur Radio Antenna

 

The Municipal Administrator referred to the correspondence the District has received from the owner of 3343 University Woods wishing to install an amateur radio antenna, noting that matters concerning radio communications fall within the constitutional jurisdiction of the Federal government. 

 

However, before an antenna of this type can be erected, said Mr. Cochrane, the applicant is required by the Federal government to consult with the local land use authority prior to installing an antenna structure, although no jurisdictional authority is delegated to the local government with respect to approvals for antennas.

 

Noting that Mr. Hudson had consulted the District of Oak Bay regarding a proposed antenna installation three years ago, Mr. Cochrane pointed out that the request before Council now is a much different design than the previous one, which was more of a tower structure with a much wider base.

 

Donald Hudson, Applicant, stated that he only wishes to improve his ability to enjoy his hobby and, as a volunteer with the communications component of the Oak Bay Emergency Program, he would hope the proposed upgraded antenna could augment the Program’s current operations.  Mr. Hudson noted that he has a three-day battery powered backup system in place and should a serious event occur his high frequency communications setup would be a benefit to the community.  In this application, he said, he is proposing to install a 12 gauge wire antenna, suspended from a tree in the middle of the backyard and by erecting two narrow 35-foot aluminium poles on the side yard and backyard, as indicated in the photographs and diagrams attached to his submission.

 

Mr. Hudson noted that his current system includes five Isotron antennas which he would remove, with the exception of the vertical posts, should the new antenna’s performance be superior.

 

Mr. Hudson said he provided nearby neighbours with a description of his plans through the ten letters he sent, noting he summarized his responses to the five replies he received in his submission as well.  He also noted that he was aware of the restrictive covenants when he bought in the subdivision, however, was advised by legal council that because of the numerous infractions on other properties (such as satellite dishes), it would not be enforceable.

 

There was discussion regarding the private restrictive covenants, known as a statutory building scheme, on the residential subdivision between the property owners and the property developer that prohibits an antenna from being erected, and it was noted that the District of Oak Bay is not party to the covenant and would not be involved in any enforcement.    

 

Responding to a question from a member of Council, Mr. Cochrane said the applicant would not be obligated to forward concerns or petitions from nearby residents to Industry Canada, although the petition received by Council could be forward by the District of Oak Bay in its submission to Industry Canada, should that be desired.

 

Responding to questions from Council, Mr. Hudson went on to provide further details of the proposed antenna installation.

 

Philip Lin, the Director of Communications for the Oak Bay Emergency Program, said he and the Chief and Deputy Fire Chief, who are responsible for the Emergency Program, support Mr. Hudson in his endeavour to install an amateur radio antenna.  Mr. Lin confirmed that the current Oak Bay Emergency Program system is estimated to have a 24 hour backup system and he would like to encourage Council to support Mr. Hudson’s proposal as he is one of the few HAMM operators contributing to the local Program.

 

With respect to a comment from a member of Council, it was noted that the Oak Bay Emergency Program communications system does not have the capability that allows a signal to carry a long distance such as Mr. Hudson’s high frequency system, and that it would be an advantage to have as many resources as possible in an emergency situation.

 

Leslie Miller Brooks, stated that upon returning home from vacation four and a half years ago she observed that Isotron antennas, one of them being 15 feet tall, had been erected and a concrete pad had been poured on the bluff on the property abutting hers and it is an eyesore she has to look at everyday.   Ms. Miller Brooks added that underground wiring was one of the features of moving to the area, and with even the possible removal of the Isotrons, the new poles would still be visible along with the existing pole that would remain.

 

Ben Van Drimmelen, volunteer with the Oak Bay Emergency Program, was in attendance to state his support for Mr. Hudson’s proposal expressing the hope that Council will support the request.

 

Logan Stewart, said he bought his University Woods home 20 years ago and he and all residents appreciated the restrictive covenants that had been put in place.  Mr. Stewart said that the residents feel the same about this proposal as the one that was considered three years ago, which was not supported. 

 

With respect to the existing Isotrons, he said no one was consulted and he asked that Council support the community standards of University Woods that prohibits above ground wiring and antennas.  Additionally, said Mr. Stewart, if Mr. Hudson wishes to contribute the use of his radio equipment to the Oak Bay Emergency Program he could take it to the Municipal Hall for use there.

 

Ross McKay, commented that the University Woods’ restrictive covenants are similar to those registered for the Wessex subdivision and the Uplands area where property is sold with the understanding that no antennas are permitted, adding that the application is an intrusion of that covenant.

 

Although Mr. McKay said Mr. Hudson’s HAMM radio operation would be useful in a disaster, a radio system such as this does not belong in a residential area and would be more suitably located at the Oak Bay Municipal Hall, he said.

 

Bob Adair, said he owns the lot next to Mr. Hudson, and that he may be the most affected by his application and asked Council members how they would like to look at antennas such as that proposed, from their own homes.

 

With respect to the emergency program, Mr. Adair said the current radio system should be addressed with plans to improve the existing municipal system being considered. 

 

Following discussion, it emerged that although the building scheme is in the nature of a private covenant to which the Municipality is not a party, Council felt nonetheless that it could properly be taken as evidence of a community standard for the neighbourhood, given the submissions from neighbours which indicated that the aspects of the building scheme prohibiting antenna were still supported and valued by a significant majority of them as owners.

 

Council also acknowledged the potential for enhanced emergency radio communication represented by the application, however, if the high frequency coverage was in fact important for the emergency program, it was felt that it would be more appropriately provided on institutional property under the auspices of the Municipality, rather than relying on equipment possessed by a private citizen whose continued presence and involvement cannot be guaranteed.

 

Given the points raised, Council felt that this was a case where the greater weight should be assigned to the community concerns and standards.  Accordingly, the position was taken that the proposed works would not be appropriate within their surroundings.

 

MOVED by Councillor Herbert

Seconded by Councillor Braithwaite, That correspondence items no. 2009-4 to 2009-4-5 be received and further that staff be directed to write to Industry Canada to indicate that Council is not in favour of the application from the owner of 3343 University Woods with respect to a proposed antenna installation.

 

It was noted that Council’s comments regarding the application would be included in the letter to Industry Canada.

 

The question was then called.

 

CARRIED

 

4.

2009-5

DIRECTOR OF BUILDING AND PLANNING, December 8, 2008

Re Request to Undertake Work on Building Protected by Restrictive Covenant – 230 King George Terrace

 

MOVED by Councillor Braithwaite

Seconded by Councillor Copley, That pursuant to the restrictive covenant registered against the property, approval be given for the plans for construction of an addition to the single family dwelling located at 230 King George Terrace, as outlined in correspondence item no. 2009-5.

 

CARRIED

 

 

5.

2009-6

DIRECTOR OF BUILDING AND PLANNING, December 2, 2008

Re Development Variance Permit Application – 754 Oliver Street

 

The Director of Building and Planning noted that the owner wishes to improve the property with landscaping, which would include construction of an arbour structure and paved pathways, requiring variances to the front lot line setback and maximum allowable paved surface as noted in his memorandum.

 

Ms. Susan Tanner, applicant, responding to a question with respect to the concrete retaining walls, said that the original walls have been replaced and that vegetation will be planted along the walls to soften their look.

 

With respect to questions regarding the percentage of paved surfaces, Ms. Tanner added that much of the paved area already exists.

 

MOVED by Councillor Jensen

Seconded by Councillor Cassidy, That the Director of Building and Planning be authorized to issue a Development Variance Permit with respect to 754 Oliver Street (Lot A, Section 22, Victoria District, Plan VIP 51700) that will vary the following provisions of Bylaw No. 3531, being the Zoning Bylaw, 1986, as amended:

 

Bylaw Section

Required

Requested

Variance

6.5.4.(2)(a)

Minimum Front Lot Line Setback, Arbour Structure

 

7.62 m

 

0.61 m

 

7.01 m

 

 

 

 

4.15.1

Maximum Paved Surfaces

 

25%

 

48%

 

23%

 

to accommodate landscaping the front yard which includes construction of an arbour and pathways as shown in the plans attached to the memorandum from the Director of Building and Planning dated December 2, 2008.

 

MOVED by Councillor Jensen

Seconded by Councillor Cassidy, That the motion in respect of the development variance permit for 754 Oliver Street be tabled to allow notice to be given in accordance with the Local Government Act.

 

CARRIED

 

6.

2009-7

DIRECTOR OF BUILDING AND PLANNING, December 2, 2008

Re Development Variance Permit Application – 3003 Foul Bay Road

 

The Director of Building and Planning said that the owners wish to develop an existing large attic space into a bedroom and ensuite bath.  In order to accommodate the renovations the applicants propose to construct a rear shed dormer, which, he confirmed, will not modify the currently non-conforming roof height.

 

 

 

MOVED by Councillor Jensen

Seconded by Councillor Braithwaite, That the Director of Building and Planning be authorized to issue a Development Variance Permit with respect to 3003 Foul Bay Road (Lot 24, Section 31, Victoria District, Plan 4678) that will vary the following provisions of Bylaw No. 3531, being the Zoning Bylaw, 1986, as amended:

 

Bylaw Section

Permitted

Requested

Variance

6.4.4.(3) (c)+Schedule B

Maximum Roof Height

 

9.14 m

 

9.83 m

 

0.69 m

 

to accommodate the construction of a dormer as shown in the plans attached to the memorandum from the Director of Building and Planning dated December 2, 2008.

 

MOVED by Councillor Jensen

Seconded by Councillor Braithwaite, That the motion in respect of the development variance permit for 3003 Foul Bay Road be tabled to allow notice to be given in accordance with the Local Government Act.

 

CARRIED

 

7.

2009-8

2009-8-1

DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING SERVICES, December 10, 2008

HUGH AND YVONNE RORISON, December 2, 2008

Re Boulevard Encroachment Application – 15 Beach Drive

 

The Director of Engineering Services provided an overview of his memorandum with respect to the resubmission for a boulevard encroachment for 15 Beach Drive. 

 

Mr. Marshall noted that the original agreement was never executed as the applicant had some concerns regarding liability for existing boulevard trees, and there were issues regarding sightlines being obscured by the private hedge.  Since then, the line of sight issue with respect to the hedge has been eliminated and an agreement has been established with regard to the Parks Department agreeing to take responsibility for the maintenance of the boulevard trees.

 

At this time, noted Mr. Marshall, the applicants are requesting approval for plantings, extension of the existing chain link fence versus a different fence design previously approved, and approval for the existing pond partially situated on public property.  With respect to the proposed fencing extension, Mr. Marshall noted that due to the terrain it would provide pedestrian safety along this portion of the sidewalk, and for that reason approval of the fence is recommended.

 

Hugh Rorison, Applicant, confirmed that the request to extend the existing fencing is due to the steep terrain, which leads down to the pond, which has been found to encroach slightly onto Municipal property, as noted by Mr. Marshall.

 

Mayor Causton noted the staff recommendations, and suggested that staff had done their due diligence in this regard, and the recommendation should be endorsed.

 

There was discussion regarding the pond encroaching on municipal property and the view was expressed by some members of Council that permission should have been obtained prior to its installation.  There was further discussion regarding the timelines surrounding the installation of the pond and the original encroachment request being considered by Council, and it was suggested that the original boulevard encroachment application plans should be brought forward to assist Council in clarifying some of the issues surrounding the application.  

MOVED by Councillor Jensen

Seconded by Councillor Herbert, That the application for the boulevard encroachment for 15 Beach Drive be tabled to the next meeting of the Committee of the Whole to enable staff to bring forward the original encroachment application.  

 

CARRIED

 

There was consensus to amend the order of the agenda.

 

8.

2009-11

GREATER VICTORIA DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, November 28, 2008

Re Request for Grant

 

Sasha Angus, Economic Development Officer Greater Victoria Development Agency, provided an overview of the benefits and purpose of the Greater Victoria Development Agency (GVDA), saying it is a support agency for local businesses and provides an industry-led solution to coordinated regional economic development.  Mr. Angus drew attention to the operational activities and the strategic priorities to support growth and retention of local businesses. 

 

Mr. Angus reviewed the GVDA funding partners, noting Provincial and Local Government support and contributions to date.  The request to the Municipality of Oak Bay, he said, is for a contribution of $10,000.

 

Following further discussion regarding the grant request, and various questions from Council being answered by the applicants, concerns were expressed by members of Council that should the provision of a grant be considered, it not be in conflict with the prohibition on providing assistance to businesses through programs or businesses supported by the GVDA with funds contributed by the Municipality.

 

The Municipal Administrator noted that any grant to the GVDA would have to be tied to a specific project or activity which was of benefit to the community at large and which could not be construed as providing assistance to a business, and an agreement would be required in that regard.

 

Members of Council requested that additional information be submitted by the applicants prior to Council’s Estimates Committee meetings with respect to example projects the GVDA would wish Council to consider making a contribution towards and to submit financial statements as well.

 

Roger Skillings, Board Member, Greater Victoria Development Agency, added that with the economic situation, it is necessary that something be done for the economic development or the Capital Region will be in even more trouble, adding that any assistance shows leadership to the entire region.

 

MOVED by Councillor Jensen

Seconded by Councillor Herbert, That the grant request from the Greater Victoria Development Agency in the amount of $10,000 be referred to Council’s Estimates Committee for consideration during budget deliberations, and that the Greater Victoria Development Agency be requested to submit its financial statements and a list of potential projects for funding.

 

CARRIED

 

9.

2009-12

GARRY OAK ECOSYSTEMS RECOVERY TEAM, November 21, 2008

Re Request for Grant

 

Betsy Rose, Financial Administrator, Garry Oak Ecosystems Recovery Team, provided a brief overview of the Garry Oak Ecosystems Recovery Team’s work, noting that in the last year, the Society has provided 117 of their Garry Oak Gardener’s handbooks to Oak Bay residents free of charge.  With recent funding cuts, the society is seeking funding of $500 to print 100 handbooks for distribution to Oak Bay residents, she said.

 

Mayor Causton commented that through the Capital Regional District, tax levy, Oak Bay has actually contributed towards the Garry Oak Ecosystems Recovery Team.

 

Considering that some funding has been provided, although indirectly, it was suggested that a lesser amount be granted and that 40 handbooks be offered to Oak Bay residents.

 

MOVED by Councillor Cassidy

Seconded by Councillor Herbert, That a grant in the amount of $200 towards the distribution of Garry Oak Gardener’s handbooks to Oak Bay residents, be approved.

 

CARRIED

 

10.

2009-9

DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING SERVICES, December 10. 2008

Re North Henderson Road –  Additional Pedestrian Island

 

The Director of Engineering Services advised that following the completion of the North Henderson Road bike lane project, there remains sufficient Provincial LocalMotion grant funds that could be used to accommodate additional work not contemplated in the original application.  Therefore, he said, the Engineering Department is proposing that the Municipality apply to the Province to amend the scope of the project to include a pedestrian island at the crosswalk to the main entrance to Camosun College on Foul Bay Road, as shown on the plans attached to correspondence item no. 2009-9.

 

MOVED by Councillor Herbert

Seconded by Councillor Copley, That staff be authorized to apply for an amendment to the scope of the project originally approve for funding under the Province of British Columbia’s LocalMotion grant program, to include a pedestrian island at the crosswalk on Foul Bay Road at Camosun College, as shown on the plan attached to the memorandum from the Director of Engineering Services dated December 10, 2009.

 

CARRIED

 

Discussion turned to the originally approved pedestrian island at Henderson Road and Foul Bay Road, and attention was drawn to the proposed options for the island included in the Director of Engineering Service’s memorandum. 

 

With respect to the two options presented, following some discussion, it was the majority view of Council that Option B was preferred, which includes a vertical curb around the island and plantings in it.

 

Regarding the pedestrian island, the Municipal Administrator said that a recommendation may come forward to introduce a reduced speed limit of 40 kilometres per hour south of the proposed island, regardless of the option chosen, to slow traffic in its approach to the intersection.

 

MOVED by Councillor Copley

Seconded by Councillor Braithwaite, That Option B, as described in correspondence item no. 2009-9, be approved.

 

CARRIED

 

11.

2009-10

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY OF CANADA, [Undated]

Re Request to Occupy Willows Beach Park Parking Lot and Public Sidewalks – April 5, 2009

 

MOVED by Councillor Herbert

Seconded by Councillor Cassidy, That approval be granted to the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada to occupy the Willows Beach Park parking lot on Sunday, April 5, 2009 from 6 o’clock a.m. until 1 o’clock p.m. and to occupy the sidewalks along Beach Drive, Newport Avenue, and Currie Road from 10:00 o’clock a.m. until 12:00 o’clock p.m., as detailed in correspondence item no. 2009-10, in relation to the staging of the Super Cities WALK for MS event, subject to the event organizer entering into a public property occupancy agreement in which it will among other standard requirements:

 

1)      release and indemnify the Municipality from any claims or liability associated with the event and provide evidence of public liability insurance in the amount of not less than $3,000,000; and

2)      agree to pay all invoices from the Municipality for costs incurred in connection with the event;

 

with the Municipal Clerk being authorized to execute such agreement on behalf of the District of Oak Bay.

 

CARRIED

 

12.

2009-13

OAK BAY VOLUNTEER SERVICES SOCIETY, December 8, 2008

Re Request for Grant

 

MOVED by Councillor Braithwaite

Seconded by Councillor Herbert, That the grant request from the Oak Bay Volunteer Services Society in the amount of $30,000 be referred to Council’s Estimates Committee for consideration during budget deliberations.

 

CARRIED

 

13.

2009-14

FEDERATION OF CANADIAN MUNICIPALITIES, December 2, 2008

Re Annual Municipal Dues

 

MOVED by Councillor Herbert

Seconded by Councillor Copley, That payment of the invoice for the 2009-2010 Federation of Canadian Municipalities membership dues in the amount of $2,284.78 (which excludes the optional travel contribution) be approved.

 

CARRIED

 

14.

2009-15

DEPUTY TREASURER, December 1, 2008

Re 2009 Tender Award Recommendations

 

MOVED by Councillor Herbert

Seconded by Councillor Braithwaite, That the 2009 tenders and contract extensions be awarded as follows:

 

PW01-2009 – Backhoe Rental Tender: 

W.A. Jones & Sons, based on low bid;

 

PW02-2009 – Gravel Supply Tender: 

Lehigh Northwest Materials, extension of contract;

 

PW03-2009 – Ready Mix Concrete:

Butler Brothers Supplies;

 

PW04-2009– Tandem Truck Rental Tender: 

Lopeter Trucking Ltd., based on low bid;

 

PW05-2009 – Scrap Metal Roll-Off Tender: 

Steel Pacific Recycling, extension of contract;

 

PW06-2009 – Excavator Rental Tender: 

Don Mann Excavating Ltd., based on low bid,

 

as detailed in the memorandum from the Deputy Treasurer, dated December 1, 2008 (correspondence item no. 2009-15).

 

CARRIED

 

15.

2009-16

POLICE BOARD SECRETARY, November 19, 2008

Re Contract for Police Dispatch Services

 

A member of Council expressed concern regarding the service provided by Saanich with respect to some Oak Bay residents reporting being put on hold or experiencing long answering times for non-emergency calls. 

 

In response, Mayor Causton read an excerpt from the minutes of the Oak Bay Police Board meeting held November 18, 2008, demonstrating that the Board will be addressing these concerns.

 

MOVED by Councillor Braithwaite

Seconded by Councillor Cassidy, That the signing officers of the Municipality be authorized to execute a five year contract with the District of Saanich for Police dispatch services substantially in the form of the 2004-08 contract, with the contract price for 2009 being $119,234, and with adjustments for subsequent years to be based on the percentage annual cost increase represented by the wage rate increase for the classifications of the Saanich Police bargaining unit which provide Police dispatch services.

 

CARRIED

 

 

 

16.

2009-17

MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATOR, December 8, 2008

Re Mileage Rates for Use of Personal Vehicles on Municipal Business

 

MOVED by Councillor Braithwaite

Seconded by Councillor Cassidy, That effective January 1, 2009, mileage rates for the use of personal vehicles in the course of municipal business be set for each calendar month in accordance with the fuel price-based formula described in the memorandum from the Municipal Administrator dated December 8, 2008.

 

CARRIED

 

17.

2009-18

GERD AND GERTRUDE RANFFT, December 9, 2008

Re Development Permit with Variance – 2265 Oak Bay Avenue

 

MOVED by Councillor Jensen

Seconded by Councillor Herbert, That correspondence item no. 2009-18 be received.

 

CARRIED

 

NEW BUSINESS:

 

Estevan Village Merchants Christmas Light Up

 

Councillor Cassidy commented on the enjoyable Christmas celebration put on by the Estevan Village merchants.

 

Deconstruction/Demolition Permits

 

Councillor Cassidy again expressed his concern regarding the number of deconstruction and demolition permits being requested and said he looks forward to future discussions with respect to his proposed taxation relief program to encourage heritage preservation.  It was noted that the Heritage Committee will be reviewing the issue.

 

TABLED:

 

Development Permit with Variance – 2000 Cadboro Bay Road

 

MOVED by Councillor Jensen

Seconded by Councillor Cassidy, That the following motion be lifted from the table:

 

That the Director of Building and Planning be authorized to issue a Development Permit  with respect to 2000 Cadboro Bay Road (Lot A, Section 28, Victoria District, Plan 43167), which will vary the following provision of the Sign Bylaw, 1997:

 

Bylaw Section

Permitted

Requested

Variance

 

6. (5) Maximum Free-Standing

Sign Area within Commercial Use

 

1.86 sq. m

per face

 

6.1 sq. m

per face

 

4.24 sq. m

per face

 

to accommodate the proposed addition to the existing free standing sign, as more particularly shown on the plans attached to Committee of the Whole agenda item #2008-264, being a memorandum from the Director of Building and Planning dated October 15, 2008.

CARRIED

 

The question on the main motion was then called.

 

CARRIED

 

Development Permit with Variance – 2265 Oak Bay Avenue

 

MOVED by Councillor Jensen

Seconded by Councillor Cassidy, That the following motion be lifted from the table:

 

That the Director of Building and Planning be authorized to issue a Development Permit with variance with respect to 2265 Oak Bay Avenue (Lot A, Sections 23 & 69, Victoria District, Plan 31610), allowing exterior alterations to the building located thereon in the form of the installation of a business sign as described in Committee of the Whole agenda item #2008-275, being a memorandum from the Director of Building and Planning dated October 17, 2008, and as more particularly shown in the photographic representation attached thereto, and which would vary Section 15(1) of Bylaw No. 3946, Sign Bylaw, 1997, to permit the said sign which is of a type that would not otherwise be permitted, namely a hanging sign projecting out from the face of the building.

 

CARRIED

 

The question on the main motion was then called.

 

CARRIED

 

RESOLUTIONS:

 

Bank Signing Authority

 

MOVED by Councillor Herbert

Seconded by Councillor Cassidy, That Council adopt The Royal Bank of Canada Form 380(01/2007) regarding signing officers for the Municipality, who shall be either the Mayor (or in his absence the Acting Mayor), the Finance Chair, or the Municipal Administrator, as the case may be, together with the Municipal Treasurer (or in her absence the Deputy Municipal Treasurer), and the transactions that these officers can undertake.

 

CARRIED

 

BYLAWS:

 

For Adoption

 

MOVED by Councillor Herbert

Seconded by Councillor Cassidy, That Bylaw No. 4442, Elected Official Travel Expense Bylaw Amendment Bylaw, 2008, be adopted.

 

CARRIED

 

MOVED by Councillor Herbert

Seconded by Councillor Copley, That Bylaw No. 4443, Water Rate Bylaw Amendment Bylaw No. 2, 2008, be adopted.

CARRIED

 

MOVED by Councillor Herbert

Seconded by Councillor Copley, That Bylaw No. 4444, Ticket Information Utilization Bylaw Amendment Bylaw No. 5, 2008, be adopted.

 

CARRIED

 

MOVED by Councillor Copley

Seconded by Councillor Cassidy, That Bylaw No. 4445, Financial Plan Bylaw, 2008, Amendment Bylaw No. 1, 2008, be adopted.

 

CARRIED

For First, Second and Third Reading

 

MOVED by Councillor Cassidy

Seconded by Councillor Braithwaite, That Bylaw No. 4446, Streets and Traffic Bylaw Amendment Bylaw No. 1, 2009, be introduced and read a first time.

 

CARRIED

 

MOVED by Councillor Cassidy

Seconded by Councillor Braithwaite, That Bylaw No. 4446, Streets and Traffic Bylaw Amendment Bylaw No. 1, 2009, be read a second time.

CARRIED

 

MOVED by Councillor Cassidy

Seconded by Councillor Braithwaite, That Bylaw No. 4446, Streets and Traffic Bylaw Amendment Bylaw No. 1, 2009, be read a third time.

CARRIED

 

MOVED by Councillor Braithwaite

Seconded by Councillor Copley, That Bylaw No. 4447, Sewer User Charge Bylaw Amendment Bylaw, 2009, be introduced and read a first time.

CARRIED

(Councillor Herbert against the motion)

 

MOVED by Councillor Braithwaite

Seconded by Councillor Copley, That Bylaw No. 4447, Sewer User Charge Bylaw Amendment Bylaw, 2009, be read a second time.

 

Councillor Herbert reiterated his opposition to the Bylaw as expressed in past years with respect to a portion of sewer charges being collected through utility billing versus being collected through taxation, saying it is not appropriate to hide the costs on the utility bill.  He also said he felt that this option penalizes larger families who have higher water use consumption.

 

The view that such a ‘user pay’ system was being implemented in other communities, and was a fair allocation of costs, was also expressed.

 

The question was then called.

CARRIED

(Councillor Cassidy and Herbert against the motion)

 

MOVED by Councillor Braithwaite

Seconded by Councillor Copley, That Bylaw No. 4447, Sewer User Charge Bylaw Amendment Bylaw, 2009, be read a third time.

 

CARRIED

(Councillor Herbert and Cassidy against the motion)

 

MOVED by Councillor Jensen

Seconded by Councillor Braithwaite, That Bylaw No. 4448, Water Rate Bylaw Amendment Bylaw, 2009, be introduced and read a first time.

 

CARRIED

(Councillor Herbert against the motion)

 

MOVED by Councillor Jensen

Seconded by Councillor Braithwaite, That Bylaw No. 4448, Water Rate Bylaw Amendment Bylaw, 2009, be read a second time.

 

Councillor Herbert said he would like to see the Capital Regional District’s budget with respect to conservation initiatives, indicating that he did not see the need for conservation given the usual levels of the reservoir, which was newly expanded at a significant cost to accommodate the population increase.

 

In response, Councillor Jensen confirmed that the budget is available and that the water board has been successful in getting residents to change their water use habits and conserve water wherever possible.

 

MOVED by Councillor Braithwaite

Seconded by Councillor Cassidy, That the meeting continue past the 11 o’clock p.m. hour of adjournment fixed by the Procedure Bylaw.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

It was noted that the Capital Regional District has built into its long term water conservation program appropriate incentives, i.e. rebates for low flow appliances, to encourage households to reduce their water consumption, and it was suggested they may not all be necessary any longer.

 

The question was then called.

 

CARRIED

(Councillor Herbert and Cassidy against the motion)

 

MOVED by Councillor Jensen

Seconded by Councillor Braithwaite, That  Bylaw No. 4448, Water Rate Bylaw Amendment Bylaw, 2009, be read a third time.

 

CARRIED

(Councillor Herbert and Cassidy against the motion)

 

 

 

MOVED by Councillor Copley

Seconded by Councillor Cassidy, That Bylaw No. 4449, Advance Tax Payment Interest Allowance Bylaw Amendment Bylaw, 2008, be introduced and read a first time.

 

CARRIED

 

MOVED by Councillor Copley

Seconded by Councillor Cassidy, That Bylaw No. 4449, Advance Tax Payment Interest Allowance Bylaw Amendment Bylaw, 2008, be read a second time.

 

CARRIED

 

MOVED by Councillor Copley

Seconded by Councillor Cassidy, That Bylaw No. 4449, Advance Tax Payment Interest Allowance Bylaw Amendment Bylaw, 2008, be read a third time.

 

CARRIED

 

ADJOURNMENT:

 

MOVED by Councillor Braithwaite

Seconded by Councillor Cassidy, That the open portion of the meeting of Council be adjourned and that a closed session be convened to discuss personal information about identifiable individuals who are being considered for a position appointed by the Municipality.

 

CARRIED

 

The meeting adjourned at 11:04 p.m.

 

Certified Correct:

 

 

 

_______________________________

Municipal Clerk

 

 

________________________________

Mayor