MINUTES of a regular
meeting of the MUNICIPAL COUNCIL of The Corporation of the District of Oak Bay,
held in the Council Chambers, Oak Bay Municipal Hall,
|
PRESENT: |
Councillor H. Braithwaite Councillor A. R. Cassidy Councillor S. F. B. Carson Councillor P. Copley Councillor J. D. Hebert Councillor N. B. Jensen |
|
STAFF: |
Municipal Clerk, L. Hilton Recording Secretary, D.
Beesley Municipal Treasurer, P. A.
Walker Design Engineer, R. Ding Deputy Fire Chief, D. Cockle Deputy Chief Constable, K. Thom |
MINUTES OF
MEETINGS:
Council –
July 23,
2007
MOVED by
Councillor Herbert
Seconded by
Councillor Cassidy, That the minutes of the Council meeting held on Monday,
July 23, 2007, be amended on page 8 to replace “4.83%” with “4.85%” in the two
places it appears, and that the minutes as amended, be adopted.
CARRIED
Committee of the Whole – August 13, 2007
MOVED by
Councillor Cassidy
Seconded by
Councillor Herbert, That the minutes of the Committee of the Whole meeting held
on Monday, August 13, 2007, and the recommendations contained therein, be adopted.
The writers, noted
Councillor Jensen, are, among other things, suggesting adding additional
wording to the two signs in order to direct vehicles to use the
The Municipal
Clerk clarified that the placement of one of the signs will be directly
adjacent to the parking area for the park, and the other sign would be at the
intersection of Foul Bay Road and Townley Street, directing park users to the
parking area.
Responding to
questions about the concerns expressed in the letter with respect to driveways
being blocked, Ms. Hilton advised that should residents find their driveways
blocked, the Police Department could be called upon to assist.
With respect to
the writers’ request that Engineering staff be requested to erect additional
“no parking” signage at the dead end portion of Allenby Street adjacent to the
water park, Ms. Hilton advised that the request is already under review by the
Director of Engineering Services, who has the delegated authority to designate no
parking areas.
The question
was then called.
CARRIED
There was
consensus to vary the order of the agenda to consider the correspondence in
relation to the signs at the water park at this time.
|
1. |
2007-230 |
SHELLEY ROSS,
GREG WILLIAMS, DOUG AND JANE TAYLOR LEE, August 18, 2007 Re Information
Signs for Water Park to be Placed on Public Property |
MOVED by
Councillor Herbert,
Seconded by
Councillor Copley that correspondence item no. 2007-230 be received.
CARRIED
COMMUNICATIONS:
|
2. |
2007-221 |
TIMES COLONIST
CYCLING FESTIVAL, JUNE 25, 2007 Re Request for
Road Closure for Cops for Cancer Criterium – September 15, 2007 |
Sharon White, Race Director,
Times Colonist Cycling Festival, said that a cycling ‘test’ event was held on July 29th on
the streets surrounding
Responding to a question of
Council, Ms. White confirmed the event organizers for the cycling criterium would
make efforts to re-open the streets to vehicles as soon as possible after the
conclusion of the race and fundraising activities. Ms. White also stated that the Oak Bay United
soccer team has rescheduled their regular use of the field to later in the
afternoon to accommodate the cycling event on that day.
MOVED by Councillor Herbert
Seconded by Councillor Jensen, That approval
be given for the closure of the roads bordering Windsor Park between the hours
of 7:30 a.m. and 12:00 noon, September 15, 2007, in connection with the Times
Colonist Cycling Festival Cops for Cancer Oak Bay Criterium fundraising event,
subject to the event organizer:
§
indemnifying
the Municipality from any liability arising from the event and providing
evidence of insurability in this regard; and
§
paying
for any extraordinary costs incurred by the Municipality in connection with the
event; and
§
obtaining
approval from the Oak Bay Police Department for a traffic management plan for
the event.
CARRIED
|
3. |
2007-222 |
JANET KNIGHT, August 1, 2007 Re Request for
Road Closure for Block Party on |
MOVED by Councillor Braithwaite,
Seconded by Councillor Jensen , That
permission be given for the closure of Wilmot Place on Saturday, September 1,
2007, from 4:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m., for the purpose of a neighbourhood block
party.
CARRIED
|
4. |
2007-223 |
DEIRDRE VINCENT et al, August
6, 2007 Re Request for
Road Closure for Block Party on |
MOVED by Councillor Braithwaite
Seconded by Councillor Copley, That
permission be given for the closure of the cul-de-sac at the intersection of
CARRIED
|
5. |
2007-224 |
SCOUTS Re Request for
Tag Day – September 29, 2007 |
MOVED by Councillor Cassidy
Seconded by Councillor Copley, That permission
be granted for the Greater Victoria Area branch of Scouts Canada to hold a
Scouts Apple Day fund raising event on public streets in
CARRIED
|
6. |
2007-225 |
July 10, 2007 Re Request for
Tag Days |
MOVED by Councillor Copley
Seconded by Councillor Braithwaite, That permission be
granted to the Victoria Remembrance Day Committee Poppy Fund to conduct the
sale of poppies in public places in
CARRIED
|
7. |
2007-226 |
MUNICIPAL
TREASURER, August 10, 2007 Re Municipal
Insurance Association Voting Delegate |
|
8. |
2007-227 |
MUNICIPAL
ADMINISTRATOR, July 24, 2007 Re |
MOVED by Councillor Jensen
Seconded by Councillor Braithwaite, That pursuant
to Section 13 of the Community Charter, consent be granted for the District of
Saanich to provide water supply and sewer collection system services on the
portion of the University of Victoria campus described as Lot 1, Sections 31,
44, 45, 71 and 72, Victoria District, Plan VIP57957, located within the
District of Oak Bay.
Referring to the memorandum from the
Municipal Administrator, a member of Council noted that the agreement would see
sewer from the University of Victoria (UVic), which flows through the Gordon
Head pump station, diverted to the District of Saanich and the pump station
taken over by the University. The
question was raised that as the Gordon Head pump station is currently taking
the flows from the houses on Cedar Hill X Road along with UVic’s, maybe the
flows from those houses could continue through the Gordon Head pump station and
be diverted to Saanich as well, eliminating the need to construct a lift
station.
The Municipal Clerk noted that inasmuch as
she was not involved in the discussions leading to the currently proposed
agreement, she could not provide any information in that regard, however, the
proposed agreement does lay out Oak Bay’s responsibility for constructing a lift
station in relation to the sewer diversion, an estimate for which would be
prepared by the Engineering Department.
The Design Engineer confirmed that no estimate was available at this
time.
A member of Council indicated that he would
feel more comfortable if information on the cost of the proposed lift station
was available prior to moving forward.
It was acknowledged that time is of the
essence in executing the proposed agreement as far as the University is
concerned, and
Ms. Hilton said that while undoubtedly the
Director of Engineering Services and the Municipal Administrator could provide
further information on the options discussed prior to settling on the proposed
agreement, she was unable to say if a cost estimate for the lift station would
be available by that time.
The question was then called.
CARRIED
|
9. |
2007-228 |
DIRECTOR OF
BUILDING AND PLANNING, August 3, 2007 Re Advisory
Design Panel Report – |
Attention was drawn to the recommendation from
the Advisory Design Panel to reject to proposed plans for the construction of a
garage at
MOVED by Councillor Jensen
Seconded by Councillor Copley, That the
Advisory Design Panel report with respect to
CARRIED
|
10. |
2007-229 2007-229-1 2007-229-2 2007-229-3 2007-229-4 |
BISON PROPERTIES
LTD., August 16, 2007 SUE ILES, August
13, 2007 ANTHONY AND
CAROL ANN SHELTON, August 12, 2007 MR. AND MRS.
PEARCE, August 16, 2007 MR. AND MRS.
PEARCE, August 20, 2007 Re Development
Permit Amendment – (Oak Bay Beach
Hotel) |
Rod Pendlebury, Construction Manager,
Durwest Construction Management Ltd., responding to questions regarding trees on the Oak
Bay Beach Hotel property, noted that a Douglas Fir tree and a Silver Birch tree
located in the northwest corner of the property at
Mr. Pendlebury confirmed that the only additional
tree to be removed through the development permit amendment is a
Responding to a question regarding the planned
removal of the Willow tree, Kevin Walker, Oak Bay Beach Hotel, said that
the root system of the Willow tree was such that it would interfere with the
drain tile for the proposed pool, and fallen leaves from the Willow plug the
roof eaves of the Hotel, and possibly neighbouring buildings as well. Mr. Walker went on to say that he had
discussed the possible tree removal with residents of Seaview Apartments
(located to the north of the proposed Hotel) who said that they were satisfied
with his plans to remove the tree.
MOVED by Councillor Carson
Seconded by Councillor Braithwaite, That correspondence
items no. 2007-229 to 227-229-4 be received.
CARRIED
NEW BUSINESS/REPORTS FROM OTHER COMMITTEES:
BC Hydro Turn It Off
Challenge
Councillor Copley gave an update on the ‘BC
Hydro Turn It Off Challenge’ the District of Oak Bay has been involved with,
noting that it has been a successful campaign in arising awareness of power
usage, and advising that many plans are underway to continue raising awareness.
TABLED:
Development Variance Permit –
MOVED by Councillor Jensen
Seconded by Councillor Cassidy, That the
following motion be lifted from the table:
That the Director of Building and Planning be
authorized to issue a Development Variance Permit with respect to 2861 Eastdowne
Road (Lot 34, Section 28, Victoria District, Plan 8990), varying the following
provisions of Bylaw No. 3531, being the Zoning
Bylaw, 1986, as amended, with respect to the siting of a building:
|
Bylaw Section |
Required |
Requested |
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5.4(2)(a) Minimum Front |
7.62 m |
1.22 m |
6.4 m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5.4(2)(c) Minimum Interior Side |
1.52 m |
0.60 m |
0.92 m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5.4(2)(e) Minimum Total of Side |
4.57 m |
2.22 m |
2.35 m |
to accommodate the addition of a double garage to the
front of the principal building, as shown on the sketches appended to Committee
of the Whole agenda item #2007-193, being a memorandum from the Director of
Building and Planning dated July 4, 2007.
Ted Pobran, 2861 Eastdowne Road, explained that he had worked with Oak
Bay’s Advisory Design Panel on a revised design for a two car garage at the
front of his home, and that he had accepted the Panel’s recommendation to
reject his original plans. However, said
Mr. Pobran, he would be concerned if he was asked to pay the $500 fee
associated with applying for a subsequent development variance permit from
Council. He questioned whether it was
possible for Council to waive the fee if he were to apply for a development
variance permit with a changed design for a garage on his property.
The question was then called.
DEFEATED
(Councillors
Braithwaite, Cassidy, Carson, Copley, Herbert and Jensen opposed)
MOVED by Councillor Carson
Seconded by Councillor Cassidy, That the owner of
CARRIED
Development Variance Permit – 1852 Hampshire Road
MOVED by Councillor Herbert
Seconded by Councillor Braithwaite, That
the following motion be lifted from the table:
That the Director of Building and Planning be
authorized to issue a Development Variance Permit with respect to 1852
Hampshire Road (Lot 11, Section 61, Victoria District, Plan 1266), varying the
following provisions of Bylaw No. 3531, being the Zoning Bylaw, 1986, as amended, with respect to the siting of a
structure:
|
Bylaw Section |
Required |
Requested |
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5.4(2)(c) Minimum Interior
Side |
1.52 m |
0.61 m |
0.91 m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5.4(7) Minimum Clear
Space Between Buildings and
Structures |
3.0 m |
0.51 m |
2.49 m |
to accommodate the construction of a “rose arbor”, as
shown on the sketches appended to Committee of the Whole agenda item #2007-192,
being a memorandum from the Director of Building and Planning dated June 22,
2007.
CARRIED
The question on the main motion was then
called.
CARRIED
Development Variance Permit –
MOVED by Councillor Herbert
Seconded by Councillor Jensen, That the
following motion be lifted from the table:
That the Director of Building and Planning be
authorized to issue a Development Variance Permit with respect to 880 St.
Patrick Street (Lot 33, Block B, Section 22, Victoria District, Plan 1092),
varying the following provisions of Bylaw No. 3531, being the Zoning Bylaw, 1986, as amended, with
respect to the maximum floor area of a principal building:
|
Bylaw Section |
Required |
Requested |
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5.4(6)(a) Maximum Gross Floor Area, Principal Bldg. |
360 m2 |
439 m2 |
79 m2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5.4(6)(a) Maximum Gross
Floor Area Above Basement, Principal Bldg. |
240 m2 |
439 m2 |
199 m2 |
to dispense with the requirement to eliminate
pre-existing floor space that would otherwise be necessary to accommodate the
development of new floor space in the attic area of the principal building on
880 St. Patrick Street, as more particularly described in Committee of the
Whole agenda item #2007-194, being a memorandum from the Director of Building and
Planning dated July 4, 2007.
CARRIED
The question on the main motion was then
called.
CARRIED
Development Permit Amendment –
MOVED by Councillor Herbert
Seconded by Councillor Jensen, That the
following motion be lifted from the table:
That the Director of Building and Planning be
authorized to do all acts and things necessary to issue a Development Permit to
Bison Properties Ltd. with respect to Lot A, Sections 23 and 73, Victoria
District, Plan VIP82201 and the portion of abutting foreshore zoned CD-1
(hereinafter together the “Land”), substantially as set out in the document (hereinafter the
“Amended Development Permit”) appended to the resolution with respect to the
Land forming part of the regular meeting agenda package considered by Council
on July 23, 2007, for the purpose of amending the Development Permit issued to
Bison Properties Ltd. pursuant to a resolution of Council dated June 11, 2007
(hereinafter the “Original Development Permit”), to allow changes to the
proposed development of the Land as depicted in the Original Development Permit
and to add to and alter the variances granted in the Original Development
Permit as set out in the Amended Development Permit.
CARRIED
The question on the main motion was then
called.
CARRIED
BYLAWS:
For First, Second and Third Reading
Bylaw
No. 4375
MOVED by Councillor Herbert
Seconded by Councillor Cassidy, That Bylaw
No. 4375, Fireworks Regulation Bylaw,
2007, be introduced and read a first
time.
CARRIED
(Councillor
Jensen opposed)
MOVED by Councillor Herbert
Seconded by Councillor Cassidy, That Bylaw
No. 4375, Fireworks Regulation Bylaw,
2007, be read a second time.
There was
discussion regarding what exactly a community event for the benefit of the
community at large would be, as the use of fireworks for any such event would
have to be approved by Council under the proposed Bylaw. Responding to questions, the Municipal Clerk referred
to the section of the Bylaw that contains the requirements for approval of
fireworks in connection with a community event by Council, noting that it would
be up to Council to decide what type of an event would be considered a
community event for the benefit of the community, however, she noted, it was
not envisaged that a small event to be held on a resident’s private property
would meet that criteria. There was
further discussion and Ms. Hilton noted that a community event in connection
with Canada Day, for instance, might be considered acceptable by Council in
terms of being for the benefit of the community as a whole.
While there was
some support for being less restrictive with respect to permitting fireworks
displays, it was acknowledged that the direction from Council had been to draft
a bylaw that would ban the sale of fireworks, and restrict the issuance of
permits for discharging fireworks to those community events approved by
Council, and the majority view of Council was that the Bylaw as written was
supportable.
The question was
then called.
CARRIED
(Councillors
Braithwaite and Jensen opposed)
MOVED by Councillor Cassidy
Seconded by Councillor Herbert, That Bylaw
No. 4375, Fireworks Regulation Bylaw,
2007, be read a third time.
CARRIED
(Councillors
Braithwaite and Jensen opposed)
Bylaw
No. 4376
MOVED by Councillor Herbert
Seconded by Councillor Carson, That Bylaw
No. 4376, Ticket Information Utilization
Bylaw Amendment Bylaw No. 5, 2007, be introduced and
read a first time.
CARRIED
MOVED by Councillor Herbert
Seconded by Councillor Carson, That Bylaw
No. 4376, Ticket Information Utilization
Bylaw Amendment Bylaw No. 5, 2007, be read a second
time.
CARRIED
MOVED by Councillor Herbert
Seconded by Councillor Carson, That Bylaw
No. 4376, Ticket Information Utilization
Bylaw Amendment Bylaw No. 5, 2007, be read a third
time.
CARRIED
Bylaw
No. 4377
MOVED by Councillor Jensen
Seconded by Councillor Braithwaite, That
Bylaw No. 4377, UVic Sewage Pumping
Station Transfer Agreement Authorization Bylaw, 2007, be introduced and
read a first time.
CARRIED
MOVED by Councillor Jensen
Seconded by Councillor Braithwaite, That
Bylaw No. 4377, UVic Sewage Pumping
Station Transfer Agreement Authorization Bylaw, 2007, be read a second
time.
CARRIED
MOVED by Councillor Jensen
Seconded by Councillor Braithwaite, That
Bylaw No. 4377, UVic Sewage Pumping Station
Transfer Agreement Authorization Bylaw, 2007, be read a third time.
CARRIED
ADJOURNMENT:
MOVED by Councillor Braithwaite
Seconded by Councillor Jensen, That the meeting of
CARRIED
The meeting adjourned at 8:26 p.m.
Certified
Correct:
|
_______________________________ Municipal Clerk |
|
_______________________________ |